Acupuncture blocks cold stress-induced increases in the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis in the rat

  1. Susan E Mulroney2
  1. School of Nursing and Health Studies, Georgetown University Medical Center, 421 St Mary's Hall, 3700 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, District of Columbia 20007
    1USA Departments of Histopathology
    2Pharmacology and Physiology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia 20007, USA
  1. Correspondence should be addressed to L Eshkevari; Email: eshkevl{at}georgetown.edu
  1. Figure 1

    (A and B) Effect of EA given before and concomitantly with chronic cold stress on HPA hormones. (A) Plasma ACTH levels: on day 7, all three experimental groups had significantly higher ACTH levels than the control group (*P<0.05). However, by day 14, plasma ACTH levels in the stress-only and the stress+Sham-EA animals were significantly higher than the control animals (*P<0.05). In sharp contrast, EA St36 prevented this increase when compared with the stress-only animals (#P<0.05). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the ACTH plasma levels of the ST36 animal compared with the controls. (B) Serum CORT levels: The serum CORT levels in the stress-only and Sham-EA animals were again significantly elevated when compared with control animals (*P<0.05). EA St36 prevented this elevation when compared with the stress-only and stress+Sham-EA serum CORT levels (#P<0.05). EA St36 had effectively prevented the stress-induced increases in serum CORT to levels similar to the control animals. (C) Plasma NE levels: there were no significant differences noted in the plasma NE levels of the four study groups.

  2. Figure 2

    Effect of EA on CRH message in the PVN of chronically stressed rats. Crh mRNA (normalized by GAPDH) was significantly higher in the stress-only and stress+Sham-EA animals when compared with the control animals (*P<0.05). Conversely, this was not observed when evaluating the Crh mRNA levels of the EA St36 group to that of the control animals.

  3. Figure 3

    (A and B) Effect of EA on CRH protein expression in the PVN of chronically stressed rats. CRH immunoreactivity was significantly higher in the stress-only and the stress+Sham-EA animals when compared with the control group (*P<0.01). EA St36 prevented this increase (#P<0.05). 3V, 3rd ventricle.

  4. Figure 4

    (A and B) Effect of EA on adrenal NPY and TH expression. (A) Adrenal NPY levels: adrenal NPY levels of the stress-only and stress+Sham-EA animals were significantly higher than those of the control animals (*P<0.05). By contrast, EA St36 prevented this increase (#P<0.05) such that Npy mRNA was similar to that of the control animals. (B) Adrenal TH expression: there were no significant variations noted in the adrenal TH expression when comparing groups.

  5. Figure 5

    Rat acupuncture point map. The circles mark the sham and acupuncture points St36.

| Table of Contents